condo: be used to reduce construction cost

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents real estate
Weight: 0.64
, space
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.56
, property
Weight: 0.56
Siblings condominium
Weight: 0.38
, townhouse
Weight: 0.37
, real estate agent
Weight: 0.35
, apartment
Weight: 0.35
, duplex
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to reduce construction cost 1.00
be used to save cost 0.83
increase in value 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(real estate, increase in value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(condo, be used to reduce construction cost)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(condo, be used to reduce construction cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(real estate, increase in value)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(condo, be used to reduce construction cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(real estate, increase in value)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(condo, be used to reduce construction cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(duplex, be used to save cost)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(real estate, increase in value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(condo, be used to reduce construction cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(condo, be used to reduce construction cost)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(condo, be used to reduce construction cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(duplex, be used to save cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(duplex, be used to save cost)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(condo, be used to reduce construction cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(condo, be used to reduce construction cost)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(condo, be used to reduce construction cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(condo, be used to reduce construction cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(condo, be used to reduce construction cost)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(condo, be used to reduce construction cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(condo, be used to reduce construction cost)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(condo, be used to reduce construction cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(real estate, increase in value)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(condo, be used to reduce construction cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(duplex, be used to save cost)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(condo, be used to reduce construction cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(real estate, increase in value)