condom: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents contraceptive
Weight: 0.72
, latex
Weight: 0.61
, method
Weight: 0.59
, barrier
Weight: 0.57
, product
Weight: 0.56
Siblings birth control pill
Weight: 0.35
, abortion
Weight: 0.33
, tampon
Weight: 0.32
, deodorant
Weight: 0.32
, mouthwash
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality availability 0.77
be more quality than chinese 0.77
be more difficult than products 0.77
look better than word 0.76
be better than word 0.76
be more difficult than traditional products 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(barrier, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(condom, has quality better)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(barrier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(condom, has quality better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(product, be more difficult than traditional products) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(condom, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(contraceptive, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(condom, has quality better)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(latex, be better than word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(condom, has quality better)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(latex, look better than word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(condom, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(contraceptive, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(barrier, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(barrier, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(latex, look better than word)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(latex, be better than word)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(product, be more difficult than traditional products)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(latex, look better than word)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(barrier, has quality better)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(barrier, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(latex, be better than word)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contraceptive, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(product, be more difficult than traditional products)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(abortion, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(birth control pill, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tampon, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(barrier, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(condom, has quality better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(barrier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(condom, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(contraceptive, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(condom, has quality better)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(product, be more difficult than traditional products) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(condom, has quality better)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(latex, be better than word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(condom, has quality better)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(latex, look better than word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(condom, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(deodorant, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(deodorant, has quality better)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(abortion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(abortion, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(tampon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(tampon, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(deodorant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(deodorant, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(birth control pill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(birth control pill, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(mouthwash, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mouthwash, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(condom, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(condom, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(condom, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(condom, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(condom, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(contraceptive, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(latex, look better than word)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(latex, be better than word)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(product, be more difficult than traditional products)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(barrier, has quality better)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(barrier, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(abortion, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(deodorant, has quality better)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(tampon, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(deodorant, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mouthwash, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(birth control pill, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(contraceptive, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(barrier, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(barrier, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(latex, look better than word)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(latex, be better than word)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(condom, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(product, be more difficult than traditional products)