condom: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents contraceptive
Weight: 0.72
, latex
Weight: 0.61
, method
Weight: 0.59
, barrier
Weight: 0.57
, product
Weight: 0.56
Siblings birth control pill
Weight: 0.35
, abortion
Weight: 0.33
, tampon
Weight: 0.32
, deodorant
Weight: 0.32
, mouthwash
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality better 0.94
has quality availability 0.78
has quality evil 0.78
feel bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(barrier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(condom, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(barrier, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(condom, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(contraceptive, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(condom, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(contraceptive, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(barrier, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(barrier, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(barrier, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(barrier, has quality better)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contraceptive, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(abortion, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(birth control pill, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tampon, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(barrier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(condom, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(barrier, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(condom, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(contraceptive, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(condom, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(abortion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(abortion, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(tampon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(tampon, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(deodorant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(deodorant, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(birth control pill, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(birth control pill, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(mouthwash, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mouthwash, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(deodorant, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(deodorant, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(condom, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(condom, has quality better)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(condom, has quality better)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(condom, has quality better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(condom, feel bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(condom, feel bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(condom, feel bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(condom, feel bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(condom, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(contraceptive, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(barrier, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(barrier, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(abortion, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(deodorant, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(tampon, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(deodorant, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mouthwash, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(birth control pill, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(contraceptive, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(barrier, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(condom, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(barrier, has quality better)