condom: is less effective

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents contraceptive
Weight: 0.72
, latex
Weight: 0.61
, method
Weight: 0.59
, barrier
Weight: 0.57
, product
Weight: 0.56
Siblings birth control pill
Weight: 0.35
, abortion
Weight: 0.33
, tampon
Weight: 0.32
, deodorant
Weight: 0.32
, mouthwash
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is less effective 1.00
is effective 0.93
be effective 100 percent 0.83
is more accurate 0.78
be such effective form of birth control 0.78
be more difficult than products 0.77
cost more 0.77
be more difficult than traditional products 0.77
bundle effective 0.76
be more expensive than pads 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(product, cost more)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(condom, is less effective)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(product, be more difficult than traditional products)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(condom, is less effective)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(method, is more accurate)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(condom, is less effective)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(method, is effective)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(condom, is less effective)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(contraceptive, is effective)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(condom, is less effective)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(contraceptive, is effective)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(method, is effective)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(method, is more accurate)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(product, be more difficult than traditional products)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(product, cost more)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(product, cost more)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(method, is more accurate)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(product, be more difficult than traditional products)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(method, is effective)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(contraceptive, is effective)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(tampon, be more expensive than pads)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(birth control pill, is effective)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(method, is effective)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(condom, is less effective)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(contraceptive, is effective)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(condom, is less effective)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(product, cost more)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(condom, is less effective)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(product, be more difficult than traditional products)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(condom, is less effective)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(method, is more accurate)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(condom, is less effective)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(birth control pill, is effective)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(birth control pill, is effective)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(tampon, be more expensive than pads)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(tampon, be more expensive than pads)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(condom, is less effective)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(condom, be effective 100 percent)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(condom, be effective 100 percent)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(condom, is effective)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(condom, be effective 100 percent)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(condom, is effective)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(condom, is effective)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(condom, is effective)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(condom, be such effective form of birth control)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(condom, be effective 100 percent)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(condom, be such effective form of birth control)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(condom, be such effective form of birth control)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(condom, be such effective form of birth control)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(condom, is less effective)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(condom, is less effective)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(contraceptive, is effective)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(method, is effective)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(method, is more accurate)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(product, be more difficult than traditional products)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(product, cost more)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(birth control pill, is effective)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tampon, be more expensive than pads)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(contraceptive, is effective)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(method, is effective)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(method, is more accurate)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(product, be more difficult than traditional products)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(condom, is less effective)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(product, cost more)