method: is more accurate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents approach
Weight: 0.72
, standard
Weight: 0.66
, option
Weight: 0.65
, tool
Weight: 0.61
Siblings algorithm
Weight: 0.69
, extraction
Weight: 0.67
, strategy
Weight: 0.67
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.66
, spray
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more accurate 1.00
is accurate 0.98
is more efficient 0.79
is used more 0.76
is most effective 0.76
be better than one 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(method, is more accurate)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(extraction, is more efficient)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(method, is more accurate)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(extraction, be better than one)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(method, is more accurate)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(extraction, be better than one)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(extraction, be better than one)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(method, is more accurate)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(extraction, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(extraction, is more efficient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(method, is more accurate)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(method, is more accurate)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(method, is more accurate)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(method, is accurate)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(method, is more accurate)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(method, is accurate)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(method, is more accurate)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(method, is accurate)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(method, is more accurate)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(method, is accurate)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(method, is more accurate)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(method, is most effective)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(method, is more accurate)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(method, is used more)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(method, is more accurate)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(method, is used more)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(method, is more accurate)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(method, is used more)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(method, is more accurate)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(method, is used more)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(method, is more accurate)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(method, is most effective)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(method, is more accurate)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(method, is most effective)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(method, is more accurate)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(method, is most effective)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(method, is more accurate)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(method, is more accurate)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(method, is more accurate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(method, is more accurate)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(method, is more accurate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(method, is more accurate)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(extraction, be better than one)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(method, is more accurate)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(extraction, is more efficient)