method: is most effective

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents approach
Weight: 0.72
, standard
Weight: 0.66
, option
Weight: 0.65
, tool
Weight: 0.61
Siblings algorithm
Weight: 0.69
, extraction
Weight: 0.67
, strategy
Weight: 0.67
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.66
, spray
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
is most effective 1.00
is effective 0.93
is more efficient 0.81
is efficient 0.79
is more accurate 0.76
is used more 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(method, is most effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(extraction, is more efficient)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(method, is most effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(extraction, is efficient)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(method, is most effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(extraction, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(extraction, is more efficient)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(method, is most effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(extraction, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(extraction, is efficient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(method, is most effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(method, is most effective)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(method, is most effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(method, is effective)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(method, is most effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(method, is effective)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(method, is most effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(method, is effective)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(method, is most effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(method, is more accurate)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(method, is most effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(method, is used more)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(method, is most effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(method, is used more)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(method, is most effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(method, is more accurate)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(method, is most effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(method, is used more)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(method, is most effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(method, is more accurate)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(method, is most effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(method, is effective)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(method, is most effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(method, is more accurate)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(method, is most effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(method, is used more)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(method, is most effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(method, is most effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(method, is most effective)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(method, is most effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(method, is most effective)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(method, is most effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(extraction, is more efficient)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(method, is most effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(extraction, is efficient)