:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(barrier, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(condom, work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(method, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(condom, work)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(contraceptive, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(condom, work)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(method, acting work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(condom, work)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(condom, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(contraceptive, work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(condom, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(method, work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(condom, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(barrier, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(condom, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(method, acting work)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(condom, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(barrier, work)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(condom, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(contraceptive, work)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(condom, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(method, work)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(condom, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(method, acting work)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(condom, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(condom, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(tampon, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(condom, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(condom, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(abortion, work)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(barrier, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(condom, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(condom, work)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(method, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(condom, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(condom, work)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(condom, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(tampon, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(tampon, work)
Salient implies Plausible
0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(condom, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(condom, work)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(condom, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(condom, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(condom, work)
Typical implies Plausible
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(condom, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(condom, work)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(condom, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(contraceptive, work)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(condom, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(method, work)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(condom, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(method, acting work)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(condom, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(barrier, work)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(condom, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(abortion, work)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(condom, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(mouthwash, work)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(condom, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(tampon, work)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(condom, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(deodorant, work)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(condom, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(method, work)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(condom, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(barrier, work)