method: acting exactly work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents approach
Weight: 0.72
, standard
Weight: 0.66
, option
Weight: 0.65
, tool
Weight: 0.61
Siblings algorithm
Weight: 0.69
, extraction
Weight: 0.67
, strategy
Weight: 0.67
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.66
, spray
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
acting exactly work 1.00
acting work 0.92
is work 0.78
work 0.77
act bad 0.75
do 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(standard, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, acting exactly work)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(option, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, acting exactly work)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(tool, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, acting exactly work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(tool, work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(option, work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(standard, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(option, work)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(standard, work)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tool, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(strategy, do)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(algorithm, is work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(strategy, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(extraction, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(standard, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(method, acting exactly work)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(option, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(method, acting exactly work)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(tool, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(method, acting exactly work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(algorithm, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(algorithm, is work)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(extraction, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(extraction, work)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(strategy, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(strategy, work)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(algorithm, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(algorithm, work)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(strategy, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(strategy, do)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(method, acting exactly work)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(method, acting work)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(method, acting work)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(method, acting work)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(method, work)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(method, act bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(method, act bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(method, work)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(method, act bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(method, act bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(method, work)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(method, acting work)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(method, work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(method, acting exactly work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, acting exactly work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(tool, work)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(standard, work)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(option, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(extraction, work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(strategy, work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(algorithm, is work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(strategy, do)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(algorithm, work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(tool, work)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(standard, work)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(method, acting exactly work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(option, work)