condominium: be at complex

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents property
Weight: 0.66
, home
Weight: 0.62
, real estate
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.58
, development
Weight: 0.58
Siblings condo
Weight: 0.38
, townhouse
Weight: 0.36
, duplex
Weight: 0.35
, real estate agent
Weight: 0.34
, bungalow
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at complex 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(condominium, be at complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(condo, be at complex)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(condominium, be at complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(condo, be at complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(condo, be at complex)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(condominium, be at complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(condominium, be at complex)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(condominium, be at complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(condominium, be at complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(condominium, be at complex)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(condominium, be at complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(condominium, be at complex)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(condominium, be at complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(condo, be at complex)