conifer: be adapted to cold weather climates

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.68
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.55
, evergreen
Weight: 0.50
, shrub
Weight: 0.50
, topic
Weight: 0.46
Siblings juniper
Weight: 0.74
, douglas fir
Weight: 0.73
, cedar
Weight: 0.70
, pine
Weight: 0.67
, pine tree
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be adapted to cold weather climates 1.00
be adapted to weather climates 0.99
be adapted to cold climates 0.98
be adapted to climates 0.94
live in colder climates 0.91
live in climates 0.89
be adapted to dry conditions 0.89
be adapted to conditions 0.87
survive cold winters of subarctic 0.83
survive cold winters 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(deciduous tree, be adapted to cold climates)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(deciduous tree, be adapted to climates)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(evergreen, survive cold winters)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(evergreen, survive cold winters of subarctic)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(evergreen, survive cold winters of subarctic)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(deciduous tree, be adapted to cold climates)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(deciduous tree, be adapted to climates)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(evergreen, survive cold winters)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(evergreen, survive cold winters of subarctic)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(evergreen, survive cold winters)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deciduous tree, be adapted to climates)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(deciduous tree, be adapted to cold climates)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(deciduous tree, be adapted to cold climates)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(deciduous tree, be adapted to climates)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(evergreen, survive cold winters)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(evergreen, survive cold winters of subarctic)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(conifer, be adapted to weather climates)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to weather climates)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(conifer, live in colder climates)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(conifer, live in colder climates)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(conifer, live in colder climates)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(conifer, live in colder climates)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(conifer, live in climates)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(conifer, live in climates)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(conifer, be adapted to dry conditions)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(conifer, be adapted to weather climates)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to dry conditions)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(conifer, live in climates)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(conifer, live in climates)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(conifer, be adapted to weather climates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(conifer, live in climates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(conifer, be adapted to conditions)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(conifer, live in climates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(conifer, live in climates)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(conifer, live in climates)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to conditions)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(conifer, live in colder climates)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(conifer, live in colder climates)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(conifer, be adapted to dry conditions)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(conifer, be adapted to conditions)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(conifer, be adapted to conditions)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(conifer, live in colder climates)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(conifer, live in colder climates)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(conifer, be adapted to dry conditions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(evergreen, survive cold winters of subarctic)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(deciduous tree, be adapted to cold climates)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(deciduous tree, be adapted to climates)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(evergreen, survive cold winters)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(evergreen, survive cold winters of subarctic)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(deciduous tree, be adapted to cold climates)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(deciduous tree, be adapted to climates)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(evergreen, survive cold winters)