conifer: be adapted to conditions

Related concepts

Parents	species Weight: 0.68 , deciduous tree Weight: 0.55 , evergreen Weight: 0.50 , shrub Weight: 0.50 , topic Weight: 0.46
Siblings	juniper Weight: 0.74 , douglas fir Weight: 0.73 , cedar Weight: 0.70 , pine Weight: 0.67 , pine tree Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be adapted to conditions	1.00
be adapted to dry conditions	0.95
be adapted to environment	0.90
be adapted	0.89
be adapted to weather climates	0.88
be adapted to climates	0.88
be adapted to cold climates	0.87
be adapted to cold weather climates	0.87
be adapted living	0.85
adapt	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(deciduous tree, be adapted to climates) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(conifer, be adapted to conditions)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(deciduous tree, be adapted to cold climates) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(conifer, be adapted to conditions)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(species, adapt) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(conifer, be adapted to conditions)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(deciduous tree, be adapted to climates)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(species, adapt)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(deciduous tree, be adapted to cold climates)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(deciduous tree, be adapted to climates)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(deciduous tree, be adapted to cold climates)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(species, adapt)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(pine, be adapted)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(pine, be adapted to environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(deciduous tree, be adapted to climates) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(conifer, be adapted to conditions)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(deciduous tree, be adapted to cold climates) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(conifer, be adapted to conditions)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(species, adapt) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(conifer, be adapted to conditions)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(pine, be adapted to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(pine, be adapted to environment)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(pine, be adapted) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(pine, be adapted)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(conifer, be adapted to conditions)

Similarity expansion

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(conifer, be adapted to dry conditions)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to dry conditions)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(conifer, be adapted to weather climates)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(conifer, be adapted living)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(conifer, be adapted to dry conditions)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to weather climates)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be adapted living)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(conifer, be adapted to dry conditions)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(conifer, be adapted to weather climates)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(conifer, be adapted to cold weather climates)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(conifer, be adapted to weather climates)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(conifer, be adapted living)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(conifer, be adapted living)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to conditions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(conifer, be adapted to conditions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(species, adapt)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(deciduous tree, be adapted to cold climates)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(deciduous tree, be adapted to climates)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(pine, be adapted to environment)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(pine, be adapted)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(species, adapt)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(deciduous tree, be adapted to climates)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(conifer, be adapted to conditions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(deciduous tree, be adapted to cold climates)