conifer: be suited for harsh winters

Related concepts

Parents	species Weight: 0.68 , deciduous tree Weight: 0.55 , evergreen Weight: 0.50 , shrub Weight: 0.50 , topic Weight: 0.46
Siblings	juniper Weight: 0.74 , douglas fir Weight: 0.73 , cedar Weight: 0.70 , pine Weight: 0.67 , pine tree Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be suited for harsh winters	1.00
be suited for winters	0.95
survive cold winters	0.88
survive bitter cold winters	0.88
survive bitter winters	0.87
survive bitter cold winters of subarctic	0.86
survive winters	0.86
survive bitter winters of subarctic	0.85
survive cold winters of subarctic	0.85
survive bitterly cold winters	0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(evergreen, survive winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(conifer, be suited for harsh winters)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(evergreen, survive cold winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(conifer, be suited for harsh winters)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(evergreen, survive cold winters of subarctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(conifer, be suited for harsh winters)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(evergreen, survive bitter cold winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(conifer, be suited for harsh winters)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(evergreen, survive bitter winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(conifer, be suited for harsh winters)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.00

Plausible(evergreen, survive bitter cold winters of subarctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(conifer, be suited for harsh winters)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(evergreen, survive bitterly cold winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(conifer, be suited for harsh winters)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.00

Plausible(evergreen, survive bitter winters of subarctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(conifer, be suited for harsh winters)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Plausible(evergreen, survive bitter cold winters)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Plausible(evergreen, survive bitter winters)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Plausible(evergreen, survive bitter cold winters of subarctic)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Plausible(evergreen, survive bitter winters of subarctic)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(evergreen, survive cold winters of subarctic)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Plausible(evergreen, survive bitterly cold winters)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(evergreen, survive cold winters)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(evergreen, survive winters)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(evergreen, survive bitter cold winters)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(evergreen, survive bitter winters)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Remarkable(evergreen, survive bitter cold winters of subarctic)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Remarkable(evergreen, survive bitter winters of subarctic)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(evergreen, survive cold winters of subarctic)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(evergreen, survive bitterly cold winters)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(evergreen, survive cold winters)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(evergreen, survive winters)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(evergreen, survive cold winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(conifer, be suited for harsh winters)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(evergreen, survive winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(conifer, be suited for harsh winters)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(evergreen, survive bitter cold winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(conifer, be suited for harsh winters)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(evergreen, survive bitter winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(conifer, be suited for harsh winters)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.00

Plausible(evergreen, survive bitter cold winters of subarctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(conifer, be suited for harsh winters)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(evergreen, survive cold winters of subarctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(conifer, be suited for harsh winters)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.00

Plausible(evergreen, survive bitter winters of subarctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(conifer, be suited for harsh winters)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(evergreen, survive bitterly cold winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(conifer, be suited for harsh winters)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(conifer, be suited for harsh winters)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(conifer, be suited for winters)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(conifer, be suited for winters)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(conifer, be suited for winters)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for winters)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for harsh winters)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(conifer, be suited for harsh winters)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive bitter cold winters)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive bitter cold winters of subarctic)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive bitter winters of subarctic)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive bitter winters)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive bitterly cold winters)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive cold winters of subarctic)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive cold winters)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive winters)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive bitter cold winters)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive bitter cold winters of subarctic)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive bitter winters)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive bitter winters of subarctic)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive bitterly cold winters)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive cold winters of subarctic)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive cold winters)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(conifer, be suited for harsh winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive winters)