conifer: be suited for winters

Related concepts

Parents	species Weight: 0.68 , deciduous tree Weight: 0.55 , evergreen Weight: 0.50 , shrub Weight: 0.50 , topic Weight: 0.46
Siblings	juniper Weight: 0.74 , douglas fir Weight: 0.73 , cedar Weight: 0.70 , pine Weight: 0.67 , pine tree Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be suited for winters	1.00
be suited for harsh winters	0.95
survive cold winters	0.88
survive winters	0.88
survive cold winters of subarctic	0.86
survive winters of subarctic	0.85
survive bitter cold winters	0.85
survive bitter winters	0.85
survive bitter cold winters of subarctic	0.85
survive bitter winters of subarctic	0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(evergreen, survive winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(conifer, be suited for winters)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(evergreen, survive cold winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(conifer, be suited for winters)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(evergreen, survive cold winters of subarctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(conifer, be suited for winters)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.02

Plausible(evergreen, survive winters of subarctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(conifer, be suited for winters)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(evergreen, survive bitter winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(conifer, be suited for winters)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(evergreen, survive bitter cold winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(conifer, be suited for winters)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.00

Plausible(evergreen, survive bitter cold winters of subarctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(conifer, be suited for winters)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.00

Plausible(evergreen, survive bitter winters of subarctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(conifer, be suited for winters)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(evergreen, survive cold winters of subarctic)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Plausible(evergreen, survive winters of subarctic)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Plausible(evergreen, survive bitter cold winters)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Plausible(evergreen, survive bitter winters)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Plausible(evergreen, survive bitter cold winters of subarctic)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Plausible(evergreen, survive bitter winters of subarctic)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(evergreen, survive cold winters)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(evergreen, survive winters)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Remarkable(evergreen, survive bitter cold winters of subarctic)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(evergreen, survive bitter cold winters)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(evergreen, survive cold winters of subarctic)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Remarkable(evergreen, survive bitter winters of subarctic)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(evergreen, survive bitter winters)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(evergreen, survive winters of subarctic)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(evergreen, survive cold winters)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(evergreen, survive winters)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(evergreen, survive winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(conifer, be suited for winters)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(evergreen, survive cold winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(conifer, be suited for winters)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(evergreen, survive cold winters of subarctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(conifer, be suited for winters)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.02

Plausible(evergreen, survive winters of subarctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(conifer, be suited for winters)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(evergreen, survive bitter cold winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(conifer, be suited for winters)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.01

Plausible(evergreen, survive bitter winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(conifer, be suited for winters)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.00

Plausible(evergreen, survive bitter cold winters of subarctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(conifer, be suited for winters)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.00

Plausible(evergreen, survive bitter winters of subarctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(conifer, be suited for winters)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(conifer, be suited for winters)

Similarity expansion

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(conifer, be suited for harsh winters)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for harsh winters)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(conifer, be suited for harsh winters)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(conifer, be suited for harsh winters)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for winters)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(conifer, be suited for winters)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive bitter winters of subarctic)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive bitter cold winters of subarctic)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive bitter cold winters)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive bitter winters)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive winters of subarctic)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive cold winters of subarctic)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive winters)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive cold winters)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive bitter cold winters of subarctic)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive bitter cold winters)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive bitter winters of subarctic)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive cold winters of subarctic)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive winters of subarctic)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive bitter winters)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive winters)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(conifer, be suited for winters) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive cold winters)