conservation: be important in africa

Related concepts

Parents	program Weight: 0.62 , topic Weight: 0.60 , strategy Weight: 0.59 , concept Weight: 0.59 , issue Weight: 0.58
Siblings	biodiversity Weight: 0.34 , ecology Weight: 0.34 , wildlife Weight: 0.34 , recycling Weight: 0.33 , animal husbandry Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important in africa	1.00
be important in south africa	0.95
be important in india	0.83
be endangered in india	0.79
be such problem in america	0.77
be paid for for europe	0.76
be important in zealand	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(program, be paid for for europe) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(conservation, be important in africa)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(issue, be such problem in america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(conservation, be important in africa)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(conservation, be important in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(conservation, be important in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(program, be paid for for europe)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(program, be paid for for europe)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(issue, be such problem in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be endangered in india)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(ecology, be important in africa)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important in india)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(program, be paid for for europe) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(conservation, be important in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(conservation, be important in africa)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(issue, be such problem in america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(conservation, be important in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(conservation, be important in africa)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(conservation, be important in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(ecology, be important in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(ecology, be important in africa)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(conservation, be important in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(wildlife, be important in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important in india)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(conservation, be important in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(wildlife, be endangered in india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(conservation, be important in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(conservation, be important in africa)

Similarity expansion

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(conservation, be important in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(conservation, be important in south africa)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.85

Typical(conservation, be important in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(conservation, be important in south africa)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(conservation, be important in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(conservation, be important in south africa)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(conservation, be important in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important in south africa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(conservation, be important in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(conservation, be important in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important in africa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(conservation, be important in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(conservation, be important in africa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(program, be paid for for europe)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(ecology, be important in africa)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(wildlife, be important in india)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(wildlife, be endangered in india)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.85

Typical(conservation, be important in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

Typical(conservation, be important in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(program, be paid for for europe)