conservation: be in agriculture

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.62
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, strategy
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, ecology
Weight: 0.34
, wildlife
Weight: 0.34
, recycling
Weight: 0.33
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in agriculture 1.00
be beneficial on farm 0.77
be beneficial on farm for economic reasons 0.76
be important in tourism 0.76
is textiles industry 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important in tourism)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(conservation, be in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important in tourism)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(conservation, be in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(conservation, be in agriculture)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(conservation, be in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(conservation, be in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be in agriculture)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(conservation, be in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(conservation, be in agriculture)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important in tourism)