wildlife: be important in tourism

Related concepts

Parents	land Weight: 0.62 , resource Weight: 0.58 , subject Weight: 0.56 , attraction Weight: 0.55 , topic Weight: 0.55
Siblings	geyser Weight: 0.43 , national forest Weight: 0.35 , wetland Weight: 0.35 , conservation Weight: 0.34 , animal husbandry Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important in tourism	1.00
be for tourists	0.80
be important for economy	0.78
help in development of economy	0.77
be in agriculture	0.76
affect economic development of country	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.98

Plausible(attraction, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(wildlife, be important in tourism)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.99

Plausible(attraction, be for tourists) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(wildlife, be important in tourism)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(resource, be important for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(wildlife, be important in tourism)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(resource, help in development of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(wildlife, be important in tourism)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(resource, affect economic development of country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(wildlife, be important in tourism)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Plausible(attraction, be important in tourism)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(resource, be important for economy)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Plausible(attraction, be for tourists)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(resource, help in development of economy)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(resource, affect economic development of country)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(attraction, be important in tourism)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(attraction, be for tourists)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(resource, help in development of economy)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(resource, affect economic development of country)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(resource, be important for economy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(conservation, be in agriculture)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.98

Plausible(attraction, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important in tourism)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.99

Plausible(attraction, be for tourists) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important in tourism)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(resource, be important for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important in tourism)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(resource, help in development of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important in tourism)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(resource, affect economic development of country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important in tourism)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(conservation, be in agriculture) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(conservation, be in agriculture)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(wildlife, be important in tourism)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important in tourism)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(wildlife, be important in tourism)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(attraction, be important in tourism)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(resource, affect economic development of country)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(resource, be important for economy)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(resource, help in development of economy)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(attraction, be for tourists)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(conservation, be in agriculture)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(attraction, be important in tourism)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(attraction, be for tourists)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(resource, be important for economy)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(resource, help in development of economy)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(wildlife, be important in tourism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(resource, affect economic development of country)