conservation: have law of physics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.62
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, strategy
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, ecology
Weight: 0.34
, wildlife
Weight: 0.34
, recycling
Weight: 0.33
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have law of physics 1.00
have important law of physics 0.99
have law 0.85
be in physics described 0.85
law of is law 0.85
be in physics described with formulas 0.83
have important law 0.82
be science 0.78
is science 0.77
be new science 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(concept, be in physics described with formulas)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(conservation, have law of physics)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(concept, be in physics described)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(conservation, have law of physics)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(concept, be in physics described)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(concept, be in physics described with formulas)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(concept, be in physics described)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(concept, be in physics described with formulas)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be new science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ecology, is science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(concept, be in physics described)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(conservation, have law of physics)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(concept, be in physics described with formulas)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(conservation, have law of physics)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(ecology, is science)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ecology, is science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(ecology, be science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(ecology, be science)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ecology, be new science)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ecology, be new science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(conservation, have law of physics)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(conservation, have important law of physics)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(conservation, have important law of physics)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(conservation, have important law of physics)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(conservation, law of is law)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(conservation, law of is law)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(conservation, have important law of physics)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(conservation, have law)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(conservation, law of is law)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(conservation, have law)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(conservation, law of is law)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(conservation, have law)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(conservation, have law)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(conservation, have important law)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(conservation, have important law)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(conservation, have important law)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(conservation, have important law)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(conservation, have law of physics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(conservation, have law of physics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(concept, be in physics described)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(concept, be in physics described with formulas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ecology, be science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecology, is science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ecology, be new science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(concept, be in physics described)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(conservation, have law of physics)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(concept, be in physics described with formulas)