conservative party: has quality joke

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents political party
Weight: 0.87
, party
Weight: 0.84
, critic
Weight: 0.61
, opposition
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.53
Siblings labour party
Weight: 0.44
, democratic party
Weight: 0.42
, tory
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality joke 1.00
has quality jokes 0.91
has quality bad 0.80
has quality good 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(critic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(conservative party, has quality joke)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(conservative party, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(critic, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(conservative party, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(critic, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(critic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(conservative party, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(conservative party, has quality joke)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(conservative party, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(conservative party, has quality joke)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(conservative party, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(conservative party, has quality jokes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(conservative party, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(conservative party, has quality jokes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(conservative party, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(conservative party, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(conservative party, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(conservative party, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(conservative party, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(conservative party, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(conservative party, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(conservative party, has quality jokes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(conservative party, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(conservative party, has quality jokes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(conservative party, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(conservative party, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(conservative party, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(conservative party, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(conservative party, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(conservative party, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(conservative party, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(conservative party, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(conservative party, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(conservative party, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(conservative party, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(conservative party, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(conservative party, has quality joke)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(conservative party, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(conservative party, has quality joke)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(conservative party, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(critic, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(conservative party, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(critic, has quality good)