conservative party: has quality jokes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents political party
Weight: 0.87
, party
Weight: 0.84
, critic
Weight: 0.61
, opposition
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.53
Siblings labour party
Weight: 0.44
, democratic party
Weight: 0.42
, tory
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality jokes 1.00
has quality joke 0.91
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(conservative party, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(conservative party, has quality jokes)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(conservative party, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(conservative party, has quality joke)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(conservative party, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(conservative party, has quality joke)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(conservative party, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(conservative party, has quality joke)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(conservative party, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(conservative party, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(conservative party, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(conservative party, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(conservative party, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(conservative party, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(conservative party, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(conservative party, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(conservative party, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(conservative party, has quality joke)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(conservative party, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(conservative party, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(conservative party, has quality jokes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(conservative party, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(conservative party, has quality jokes)