consistency: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.67
, virtue
Weight: 0.64
, attribute
Weight: 0.64
, quality
Weight: 0.62
, characteristic
Weight: 0.61
Siblings toughness
Weight: 0.35
, accuracy
Weight: 0.34
, continuity
Weight: 0.34
, honesty
Weight: 0.34
, discipline
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
is good quality 0.98
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
is important quality 0.90
be good 0.86
be good quality in leader 0.85
be good quality in leadership 0.84
has quality system 0.84
is most important quality 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(consistency, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(consistency, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(virtue, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(consistency, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(consistency, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(virtue, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(consistency, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(consistency, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(virtue, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality system)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(virtue, be good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(virtue, be good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(virtue, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(honesty, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(honesty, be good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(honesty, is important quality)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(honesty, is good quality)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(honesty, be good quality in leader)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(honesty, be good quality in leadership)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(honesty, is most important quality)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(honesty, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(consistency, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(consistency, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(virtue, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(consistency, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(consistency, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(virtue, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(consistency, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(consistency, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(honesty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(honesty, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(accuracy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(accuracy, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(honesty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(honesty, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(discipline, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(discipline, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(honesty, is good quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(honesty, is good quality)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(discipline, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(discipline, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(accuracy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(accuracy, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(honesty, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(honesty, be good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(honesty, is important quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(honesty, is important quality)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(honesty, be good quality in leader) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(honesty, be good quality in leader)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(honesty, be good quality in leadership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(honesty, be good quality in leadership)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(honesty, is most important quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(honesty, is most important quality)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(consistency, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(consistency, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(virtue, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(virtue, be good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(honesty, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(accuracy, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(honesty, be good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(accuracy, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(honesty, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(discipline, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(honesty, is good quality)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(honesty, be good quality in leadership)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(honesty, be good quality in leader)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(honesty, is most important quality)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(honesty, is important quality)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(virtue, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(virtue, be good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(consistency, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)