consolidation: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	strategy Weight: 0.65 , issue Weight: 0.61 , option Weight: 0.60 , factor Weight: 0.59 , step Weight: 0.58
Siblings	stock option Weight: 0.33 , expansion Weight: 0.33 , reduction Weight: 0.32 , revision Weight: 0.32 , correction Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
has quality bad	0.96
has quality better	0.94
be good for business	0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(strategy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(consolidation, has quality good)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(option, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(consolidation, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(strategy, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(option, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(option, has quality better)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(strategy, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(stock option, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(expansion, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(stock option, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(expansion, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(strategy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(consolidation, has quality good)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(option, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(consolidation, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(expansion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(expansion, has quality good)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(stock option, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(stock option, has quality good)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(expansion, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(expansion, has quality bad)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(stock option, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(stock option, has quality bad)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(expansion, be good for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(expansion, be good for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(consolidation, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(consolidation, has quality bad)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(consolidation, has quality bad)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(consolidation, has quality bad)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(consolidation, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(consolidation, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(consolidation, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(strategy, has quality good)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(option, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(expansion, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(expansion, has quality bad)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(expansion, be good for business)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(stock option, has quality bad)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(stock option, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(strategy, has quality good)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(consolidation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(option, has quality better)