expansion: be good for business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.69
, construction
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, growth
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.58
Siblings construction site
Weight: 0.35
, construction worker
Weight: 0.34
, restoration
Weight: 0.33
, revision
Weight: 0.33
, consolidation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for business 1.00
be important for business 0.94
be important in business 0.92
be important for new business 0.91
affect business 0.85
be for businesses 0.82
is good job 0.81
be considered good in economy 0.81
has quality good 0.80
be bad for environment 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(growth, be important for new business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(expansion, be good for business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(expansion, be good for business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(expansion, be good for business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(growth, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(expansion, be good for business)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(issue, be for businesses)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(expansion, be good for business)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(construction, is good job)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(expansion, be good for business)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(construction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(expansion, be good for business)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(factor, affect business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(expansion, be good for business)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(expansion, be good for business)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(expansion, be good for business)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(growth, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(expansion, be good for business)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(construction, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(expansion, be good for business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(construction, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(project, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(growth, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(factor, affect business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(issue, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(growth, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(growth, be important for new business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(project, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(construction, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(issue, be for businesses)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(construction, is good job)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important in business)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(issue, be for businesses)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(growth, be important for new business)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(factor, affect business)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(construction, is good job)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(construction, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(growth, be important in business)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(project, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(project, be important in business)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(growth, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(consolidation, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(growth, be important for new business)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(expansion, be good for business)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(expansion, be good for business)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(expansion, be good for business)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(growth, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(expansion, be good for business)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(expansion, be good for business)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(factor, affect business)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(expansion, be good for business)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(issue, be for businesses)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(expansion, be good for business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(construction, is good job)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(expansion, be good for business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(construction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(expansion, be good for business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(expansion, be good for business)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(growth, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(expansion, be good for business)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(construction, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(expansion, be good for business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(consolidation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(consolidation, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(expansion, be good for business)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be important for business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(expansion, be important for business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(expansion, be important for business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(expansion, be important for business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(expansion, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(expansion, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(expansion, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(expansion, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(expansion, be good for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(project, be important in business)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(construction, be bad for environment)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(growth, be important in business)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(growth, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, affect business)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(construction, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(issue, be for businesses)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(construction, is good job)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(growth, be important for new business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(consolidation, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(project, be important in business)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(growth, be important in business)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(construction, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(growth, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, affect business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(growth, be important for new business)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(issue, be for businesses)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(construction, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(construction, is good job)