construction: be bad for environment

Related concepts

Parents	project Weight: 0.64 , activity Weight: 0.64 , program Weight: 0.61 , expansion Weight: 0.61
Siblings	office building Weight: 0.73 , excavation Weight: 0.63 , artificial turf Weight: 0.58 , completion Weight: 0.56 , beam Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be bad for environment	1.00
affect environment	0.87
affect natural environment	0.84
make negative impact on environment	0.83
make impact on environment	0.83
make positive impact on environment	0.83
harm environment	0.82
has quality bad	0.80
be good for business	0.79
affect climate	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(expansion, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(construction, be bad for environment)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(program, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(construction, be bad for environment)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(expansion, be good for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(construction, be bad for environment)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(activity, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(construction, be bad for environment)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(activity, make negative impact on environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(construction, be bad for environment)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(activity, make positive impact on environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(construction, be bad for environment)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(activity, affect climate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(construction, be bad for environment)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(project, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(construction, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(activity, affect environment)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(project, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(activity, make positive impact on environment)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(activity, make negative impact on environment)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(activity, affect climate)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(expansion, be good for business)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(program, has quality bad)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(expansion, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(project, has quality bad)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(activity, affect environment)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(program, has quality bad)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(expansion, has quality bad)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(activity, make negative impact on environment)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(activity, make positive impact on environment)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(activity, affect climate)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(artificial turf, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(beam, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(excavation, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(activity, affect environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(construction, be bad for environment)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(expansion, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(construction, be bad for environment)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(program, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(construction, be bad for environment)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(expansion, be good for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(construction, be bad for environment)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(activity, make negative impact on environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(construction, be bad for environment)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(activity, make positive impact on environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(construction, be bad for environment)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(project, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(construction, be bad for environment)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(activity, affect climate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(construction, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

Remarkable(artificial turf, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(artificial turf, has quality bad)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(beam, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(beam, has quality bad)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

Remarkable(excavation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(excavation, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Salient(construction, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(construction, affect environment)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(construction, affect environment)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.15

Salient(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Salient(construction, affect environment)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(construction, affect environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.15

Salient(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(construction, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(activity, affect environment)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(activity, make negative impact on environment)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(activity, make positive impact on environment)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(activity, affect climate)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(expansion, has quality bad)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(expansion, be good for business)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(program, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(artificial turf, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(beam, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(excavation, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(activity, affect environment)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(activity, make positive impact on environment)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(activity, make negative impact on environment)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(activity, affect climate)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(expansion, has quality bad)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(expansion, be good for business)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(construction, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(program, has quality bad)