constellation: has zodiac names

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celestial object
Weight: 0.69
, program
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, company
Weight: 0.52
Siblings big dipper
Weight: 0.63
, orion
Weight: 0.63
, leo
Weight: 0.60
, andromeda
Weight: 0.57
, hydra
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
has zodiac names 1.00
have names 0.78
have latin names 0.76
have names of animals 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(constellation, has zodiac names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(constellation, has zodiac names)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(constellation, has zodiac names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(constellation, have names of animals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(constellation, has zodiac names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(constellation, have latin names)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(constellation, has zodiac names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(constellation, have latin names)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(constellation, has zodiac names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(constellation, have names)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(constellation, has zodiac names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(constellation, have names)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(constellation, has zodiac names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(constellation, have names)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(constellation, has zodiac names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(constellation, have names of animals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(constellation, has zodiac names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(constellation, have names)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(constellation, has zodiac names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(constellation, have latin names)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(constellation, has zodiac names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(constellation, have names of animals)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(constellation, has zodiac names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(constellation, have latin names)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(constellation, has zodiac names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(constellation, have names of animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(constellation, has zodiac names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(constellation, has zodiac names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(constellation, has zodiac names)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(constellation, has zodiac names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(constellation, has zodiac names)