constellation: have latin names

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celestial object
Weight: 0.69
, program
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, company
Weight: 0.52
Siblings big dipper
Weight: 0.63
, orion
Weight: 0.63
, leo
Weight: 0.60
, andromeda
Weight: 0.57
, hydra
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
have latin names 1.00
be named in latin 0.90
have names 0.83
have greek names 0.79
have special names 0.78
have names of animals 0.76
has zodiac names 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(constellation, have latin names)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(constellation, have latin names)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(constellation, have latin names)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(constellation, be named in latin)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(constellation, have latin names)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(constellation, be named in latin)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(constellation, have latin names)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(constellation, be named in latin)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(constellation, have latin names)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(constellation, be named in latin)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(constellation, have latin names)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(constellation, have names)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(constellation, have latin names)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(constellation, has zodiac names)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(constellation, have latin names)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(constellation, have greek names)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(constellation, have latin names)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(constellation, have names)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(constellation, have latin names)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(constellation, have names of animals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(constellation, have latin names)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(constellation, have greek names)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(constellation, have latin names)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(constellation, have names)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(constellation, have latin names)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(constellation, has zodiac names)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(constellation, have latin names)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(constellation, have special names)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(constellation, have latin names)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(constellation, have greek names)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(constellation, have latin names)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(constellation, has zodiac names)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(constellation, have latin names)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(constellation, have names)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(constellation, have latin names)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(constellation, have special names)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(constellation, have latin names)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(constellation, have names of animals)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(constellation, have latin names)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(constellation, have names of animals)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(constellation, have latin names)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(constellation, have special names)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(constellation, have latin names)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(constellation, have names of animals)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(constellation, have latin names)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(constellation, has zodiac names)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(constellation, have latin names)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(constellation, have special names)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(constellation, have latin names)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(constellation, have greek names)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(constellation, have latin names)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(constellation, have latin names)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(constellation, have latin names)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(constellation, have latin names)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(constellation, have latin names)