constellation: were named

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celestial object
Weight: 0.69
, program
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, company
Weight: 0.52
Siblings big dipper
Weight: 0.63
, orion
Weight: 0.63
, leo
Weight: 0.60
, andromeda
Weight: 0.57
, hydra
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
were named 1.00
be named 0.94
is named 0.93
were created 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(constellation, were named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(big dipper, is named)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(constellation, were named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(big dipper, is named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(big dipper, is named)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(constellation, were named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(constellation, were named)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(constellation, were named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(constellation, be named)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(constellation, were named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(constellation, be named)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(constellation, were named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(constellation, be named)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(constellation, were named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(constellation, be named)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(constellation, were named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(constellation, were created)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(constellation, were named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(constellation, were created)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(constellation, were named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(constellation, were created)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(constellation, were named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(constellation, were created)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(constellation, were named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(constellation, were named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(constellation, were named)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(constellation, were named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(constellation, were named)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(constellation, were named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(big dipper, is named)