construction worker: need work together

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents worker
Weight: 0.88
, employee
Weight: 0.74
, project
Weight: 0.67
, contractor
Weight: 0.64
Siblings carpenter
Weight: 0.70
, engineer
Weight: 0.65
, roofer
Weight: 0.63
, mason
Weight: 0.63
, electrician
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
need work together 1.00
need work 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, need work together) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need work together)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(construction worker, need work together) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(engineer, need work together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(engineer, need work together)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(construction worker, need work together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(construction worker, need work together)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(construction worker, need work together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, need work)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(construction worker, need work together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(construction worker, need work)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(construction worker, need work together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(construction worker, need work)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(construction worker, need work together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(construction worker, need work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(construction worker, need work together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(construction worker, need work together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, need work together)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(construction worker, need work together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(construction worker, need work together)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, need work together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(engineer, need work together)