construction: be in us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.64
, activity
Weight: 0.64
, program
Weight: 0.61
, expansion
Weight: 0.61
Siblings office building
Weight: 0.73
, excavation
Weight: 0.63
, artificial turf
Weight: 0.58
, completion
Weight: 0.56
, beam
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in us 1.00
be important to us 0.95
take long in us 0.88
hold up for guys 0.77
come out today 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(project, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(construction, be in us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(construction, be in us)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(project, be important to us)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(construction, be in us)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(project, be important to us)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(project, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(construction, be in us)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(construction, be in us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(construction, be in us)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(construction, be in us)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(construction, be in us)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(construction, take long in us)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(construction, be in us)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(construction, take long in us)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(construction, be in us)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(construction, take long in us)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(construction, be in us)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(construction, take long in us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(construction, be in us)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(construction, be in us)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(construction, be in us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(construction, be in us)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(construction, be in us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(construction, be in us)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(project, be important to us)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(construction, be in us)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(project, be important to us)