project: be important to us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mission
Weight: 0.65
, upgrade
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.63
, web site
Weight: 0.61
Siblings restoration
Weight: 0.69
, expansion
Weight: 0.69
, construction site
Weight: 0.68
, landscaping
Weight: 0.68
, construction worker
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to us 1.00
be important for business 0.78
be important in business 0.77
be important in development 0.76
be like cassini mission important 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mission, be like cassini mission important)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(project, be important to us)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(facility, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(project, be important to us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(project, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(facility, be important in business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(project, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(mission, be like cassini mission important)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(project, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(facility, be important in business)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(project, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mission, be like cassini mission important)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(project, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be important for business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(facility, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(project, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(project, be important to us)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mission, be like cassini mission important)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(project, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(project, be important to us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(project, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(expansion, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(expansion, be important for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(project, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(project, be important to us)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(project, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(project, be important in business)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(project, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(project, be important in development)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(project, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(project, be important in business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(project, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(project, be important in development)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(project, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(project, be important in business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(project, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(project, be important in business)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(project, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(project, be important in development)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(project, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(project, be important in development)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(project, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(project, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(project, be important to us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(project, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(project, be important to us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(project, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(facility, be important in business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(project, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mission, be like cassini mission important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(project, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(expansion, be important for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(project, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(facility, be important in business)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(project, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mission, be like cassini mission important)