construction: has shape joint

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.64
, activity
Weight: 0.64
, program
Weight: 0.61
, expansion
Weight: 0.61
Siblings office building
Weight: 0.73
, excavation
Weight: 0.63
, artificial turf
Weight: 0.58
, completion
Weight: 0.56
, beam
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
has shape joint 1.00
is joint important 0.89
be joint use in building 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(expansion, is joint important)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(construction, has shape joint)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(expansion, be joint use in building)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(construction, has shape joint)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(construction, has shape joint)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(expansion, be joint use in building)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(construction, has shape joint)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(expansion, is joint important)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(construction, has shape joint)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be joint use in building)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(construction, has shape joint)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(expansion, is joint important)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(expansion, is joint important)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(construction, has shape joint)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(construction, has shape joint)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(expansion, be joint use in building)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(construction, has shape joint)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(construction, has shape joint)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(construction, has shape joint)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(construction, has shape joint)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(construction, has shape joint)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(construction, has shape joint)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(construction, has shape joint)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(construction, has shape joint)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(construction, has shape joint)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(construction, has shape joint)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(expansion, be joint use in building)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(construction, has shape joint)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(expansion, is joint important)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(construction, has shape joint)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(expansion, be joint use in building)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(construction, has shape joint)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(expansion, is joint important)