expansion: be joint use in building

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.69
, construction
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, growth
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.58
Siblings construction site
Weight: 0.35
, construction worker
Weight: 0.34
, restoration
Weight: 0.33
, revision
Weight: 0.33
, consolidation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be joint use in building 1.00
is joint important 0.87
has shape joint 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(construction, has shape joint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(expansion, be joint use in building)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(expansion, be joint use in building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(construction, has shape joint)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be joint use in building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(construction, has shape joint)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(construction, has shape joint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(expansion, be joint use in building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(expansion, be joint use in building)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(expansion, be joint use in building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(expansion, be joint use in building)

Similarity expansion

0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(expansion, be joint use in building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(expansion, is joint important)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(expansion, be joint use in building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(expansion, is joint important)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(expansion, be joint use in building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(expansion, is joint important)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(expansion, be joint use in building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(expansion, is joint important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(expansion, be joint use in building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(expansion, be joint use in building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be joint use in building)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(expansion, be joint use in building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(expansion, be joint use in building)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be joint use in building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(construction, has shape joint)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(expansion, be joint use in building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(construction, has shape joint)