constructivism: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents theory
Weight: 0.69
, approach
Weight: 0.60
, movement
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.55
, concept
Weight: 0.52
Siblings anarchism
Weight: 0.35
, structuralism
Weight: 0.35
, relativity
Weight: 0.34
, formalism
Weight: 0.34
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
has quality wrong 0.85
has quality joke 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(movement, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(constructivism, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(approach, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(constructivism, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(constructivism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(movement, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(constructivism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(approach, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(constructivism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(movement, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(constructivism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(approach, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(constructivism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(relativity, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(constructivism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(quantum physics, has quality wrong)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(constructivism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(anarchism, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(constructivism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(structuralism, has quality wrong)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(constructivism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(structuralism, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(movement, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(constructivism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(constructivism, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(approach, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(constructivism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(constructivism, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(constructivism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(structuralism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(structuralism, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(constructivism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(relativity, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(relativity, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(constructivism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(anarchism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(anarchism, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(constructivism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(quantum physics, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(quantum physics, has quality wrong)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(constructivism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(structuralism, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(structuralism, has quality wrong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(constructivism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(constructivism, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(constructivism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(constructivism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(constructivism, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(constructivism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(constructivism, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(constructivism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(approach, has quality better)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(constructivism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(movement, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(constructivism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(relativity, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(constructivism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(quantum physics, has quality wrong)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(constructivism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(anarchism, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(constructivism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(structuralism, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(constructivism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(structuralism, has quality wrong)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(constructivism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(approach, has quality better)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(constructivism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(movement, has quality bad)