structuralism: has quality wrong

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents movement
Weight: 0.62
, approach
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.42
, theory
Weight: 0.41
Siblings anarchism
Weight: 0.35
, constructivism
Weight: 0.35
, liberalism
Weight: 0.34
, socialism
Weight: 0.33
, romanticism
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality wrong 1.00
go wrong 0.88
has quality bad 0.87
has quality good 0.85
has quality better 0.83
be in right way 0.78
has quality system 0.77
is fundamentally flawed 0.75
be in bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(movement, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(structuralism, has quality wrong)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(approach, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(structuralism, has quality wrong)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(movement, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(approach, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(movement, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(approach, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(socialism, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(anarchism, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(liberalism, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(romanticism, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(liberalism, is fundamentally flawed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(constructivism, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(socialism, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(liberalism, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(socialism, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(movement, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(structuralism, has quality wrong)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(approach, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(structuralism, has quality wrong)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(liberalism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(liberalism, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(socialism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(socialism, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(socialism, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(socialism, has quality better)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(constructivism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(constructivism, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(liberalism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(liberalism, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(socialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(socialism, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(anarchism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(anarchism, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(romanticism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(romanticism, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(liberalism, is fundamentally flawed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(liberalism, is fundamentally flawed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(structuralism, has quality wrong)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(structuralism, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(structuralism, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(structuralism, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(structuralism, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(structuralism, has quality wrong)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(structuralism, has quality wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(movement, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(approach, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(liberalism, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(liberalism, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(socialism, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(socialism, has quality better)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(anarchism, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(socialism, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(constructivism, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(liberalism, is fundamentally flawed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(romanticism, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(approach, has quality better)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(structuralism, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(movement, has quality bad)