contact: be better than glasses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents information
Weight: 0.62
, connection
Weight: 0.57
, option
Weight: 0.57
, function
Weight: 0.56
, benefit
Weight: 0.56
Siblings touch
Weight: 0.32
, link
Weight: 0.31
, telephone numbers
Weight: 0.31
, trace
Weight: 0.31
, computer database
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than glasses 1.00
be as clear as glasses 0.89
have different from glasses prescription 0.87
has physical part lenses 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(contact, be better than glasses)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(contact, be better than glasses)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(contact, be better than glasses)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(contact, have different from glasses prescription)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(contact, be better than glasses)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(contact, have different from glasses prescription)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(contact, be better than glasses)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(contact, be as clear as glasses)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(contact, be better than glasses)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(contact, has physical part lenses)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(contact, be better than glasses)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(contact, be as clear as glasses)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(contact, be better than glasses)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(contact, be as clear as glasses)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(contact, be better than glasses)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(contact, be as clear as glasses)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(contact, be better than glasses)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(contact, have different from glasses prescription)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(contact, be better than glasses)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(contact, has physical part lenses)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(contact, be better than glasses)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(contact, have different from glasses prescription)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(contact, be better than glasses)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(contact, has physical part lenses)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(contact, be better than glasses)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(contact, has physical part lenses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(contact, be better than glasses)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(contact, be better than glasses)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(contact, be better than glasses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(contact, be better than glasses)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(contact, be better than glasses)