contact: has physical part lenses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents information
Weight: 0.62
, connection
Weight: 0.57
, option
Weight: 0.57
, function
Weight: 0.56
, benefit
Weight: 0.56
Siblings touch
Weight: 0.32
, link
Weight: 0.31
, telephone numbers
Weight: 0.31
, trace
Weight: 0.31
, computer database
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part lenses 1.00
have different from glasses prescription 0.77
be better than glasses 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(contact, has physical part lenses)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(contact, has physical part lenses)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(contact, has physical part lenses)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(contact, have different from glasses prescription)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(contact, has physical part lenses)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(contact, be better than glasses)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(contact, has physical part lenses)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(contact, have different from glasses prescription)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(contact, has physical part lenses)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(contact, have different from glasses prescription)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(contact, has physical part lenses)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(contact, be better than glasses)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(contact, has physical part lenses)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(contact, have different from glasses prescription)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(contact, has physical part lenses)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(contact, be better than glasses)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(contact, has physical part lenses)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(contact, be better than glasses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(contact, has physical part lenses)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(contact, has physical part lenses)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(contact, has physical part lenses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(contact, has physical part lenses)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(contact, has physical part lenses)