context: be important in anthropology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dimension
Weight: 0.66
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, factor
Weight: 0.63
, discussion
Weight: 0.62
Siblings prefix
Weight: 0.48
, element
Weight: 0.34
, aspect
Weight: 0.34
, picture frame
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in anthropology 1.00
be important in literature 0.78
be in literature important 0.78
studying fossils 0.77
be important in archaeological research 0.77
be in literature 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(context, be important in anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(context, be important in anthropology)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(context, be important in anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(context, be in literature important)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(context, be important in anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(context, be important in literature)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(context, be important in anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(context, studying fossils)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(context, be important in anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(context, be in literature)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(context, be important in anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(context, be important in archaeological research)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(context, be important in anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(context, be important in literature)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(context, be important in anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(context, be in literature important)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(context, be important in anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(context, studying fossils)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(context, be important in anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(context, be in literature important)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(context, be important in anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(context, be in literature)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(context, be important in anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(context, be important in archaeological research)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(context, be important in anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(context, be in literature)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(context, be important in anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(context, be important in literature)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(context, be important in anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(context, studying fossils)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(context, be important in anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(context, be important in archaeological research)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(context, be important in anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(context, be important in archaeological research)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(context, be important in anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(context, studying fossils)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(context, be important in anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(context, be important in literature)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(context, be important in anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(context, be in literature important)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(context, be important in anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(context, be in literature)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(context, be important in anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(context, be important in anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(context, be important in anthropology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(context, be important in anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(context, be important in anthropology)