context: be important in archaeological research

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dimension
Weight: 0.66
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, factor
Weight: 0.63
, discussion
Weight: 0.62
Siblings prefix
Weight: 0.48
, element
Weight: 0.34
, aspect
Weight: 0.34
, picture frame
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in archaeological research 1.00
be important in research 0.83
be important in anthropology 0.77
studying fossils 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(context, be important in archaeological research)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(context, be important in archaeological research)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(context, be important in archaeological research)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(context, be important in research)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(context, be important in archaeological research)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(context, be important in research)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(context, be important in archaeological research)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(context, be important in research)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(context, be important in archaeological research)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(context, be important in anthropology)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(context, be important in archaeological research)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(context, studying fossils)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(context, be important in archaeological research)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(context, studying fossils)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(context, be important in archaeological research)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(context, be important in anthropology)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(context, be important in archaeological research)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(context, studying fossils)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(context, be important in archaeological research)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(context, be important in anthropology)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(context, be important in archaeological research)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(context, be important in research)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(context, be important in archaeological research)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(context, studying fossils)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(context, be important in archaeological research)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(context, be important in anthropology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(context, be important in archaeological research)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(context, be important in archaeological research)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(context, be important in archaeological research)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(context, be important in archaeological research)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(context, be important in archaeological research)