context: be important in history

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dimension
Weight: 0.66
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, factor
Weight: 0.63
, discussion
Weight: 0.62
Siblings prefix
Weight: 0.48
, element
Weight: 0.34
, aspect
Weight: 0.34
, picture frame
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in history 1.00
be important in archaeology 0.85
be important in literature 0.78
be in literature important 0.78
be important in art 0.77
be as important as artifact itself 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(context, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(element, be important in art)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(context, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(element, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(element, be important in art)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(context, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(context, be important in history)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(context, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(context, be important in archaeology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(context, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(context, be important in archaeology)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(context, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(context, be important in archaeology)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(context, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(context, be important in archaeology)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(context, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(context, be important in literature)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(context, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(context, be in literature important)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(context, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(context, be as important as artifact itself)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(context, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(context, be important in art)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(context, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(context, be as important as artifact itself)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(context, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(context, be in literature important)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(context, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(context, be important in literature)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(context, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(context, be as important as artifact itself)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(context, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(context, be important in art)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(context, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(context, be in literature important)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(context, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(context, be important in literature)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(context, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(context, be important in art)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(context, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(context, be important in literature)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(context, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(context, be important in art)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(context, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(context, be in literature important)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(context, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(context, be as important as artifact itself)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(context, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(context, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(context, be important in history)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(context, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(context, be important in history)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(context, be important in history)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(element, be important in art)