context: be important in archaeology

Property	Similarity
be important in archaeology	1.00
be important in history	0.85
be important in juliet	0.80
be important in research	0.79
be important in art	0.79
be important in communication	0.78
be important part of communication process	0.78
be important in literature	0.76
be in literature important	0.76

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(context, be important in history)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(context, be important in juliet)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(context, be important in art)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(context, be important in history)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(context, be important in research)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(context, be important in communication)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(context, be important in history)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(context, be important part of communication process)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(context, be important in juliet)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(context, be in literature important)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(context, be important in juliet)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(context, be important in literature)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(context, be important in research)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(context, be important in art)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(context, be important in research)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(context, be important in art)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(context, be important in communication)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(context, be important in communication)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(context, be important part of communication process)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(context, be important part of communication process)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(context, be important in literature)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(context, be in literature important)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(context, be in literature important)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(context, be important in literature)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(context, be important in research)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(context, be important in history)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(context, be important in juliet)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(context, be important in art)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(context, be important in communication)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(context, be important in literature)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(context, be important part of communication process)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(context, be important in archaeology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(context, be in literature important)

Parents	dimension Weight: 0.66 , thing Weight: 0.63 , factor Weight: 0.63 , discussion Weight: 0.62
Siblings	prefix Weight: 0.48 , element Weight: 0.34 , aspect Weight: 0.34 , picture frame Weight: 0.33

context: be important in archaeology

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings