context: be important in archaeology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dimension
Weight: 0.66
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, factor
Weight: 0.63
, discussion
Weight: 0.62
Siblings prefix
Weight: 0.48
, element
Weight: 0.34
, aspect
Weight: 0.34
, picture frame
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in archaeology 1.00
be important in history 0.85
be important in juliet 0.80
be important in research 0.79
be important in art 0.79
be important in communication 0.78
be important part of communication process 0.78
be important in literature 0.76
be in literature important 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(element, be important in art)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(element, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(element, be important in art)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(context, be important in archaeology)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(context, be important in history)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(context, be important in juliet)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(context, be important in art)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(context, be important in history)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(context, be important in research)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(context, be important in communication)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(context, be important in history)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(context, be important part of communication process)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(context, be important in juliet)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(context, be in literature important)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(context, be important in juliet)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(context, be important in literature)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(context, be important in research)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(context, be important in art)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(context, be important in research)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(context, be important in art)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(context, be important in communication)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(context, be important in communication)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(context, be important part of communication process)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(context, be important part of communication process)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(context, be important in literature)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(context, be in literature important)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(context, be in literature important)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(context, be important in literature)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(context, be important in research)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(context, be important in history)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(context, be important in juliet)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(context, be important in art)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(context, be important in communication)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(context, be important in literature)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(context, be important part of communication process)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(context, be in literature important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(context, be important in archaeology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(context, be important in archaeology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(context, be important in archaeology)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(element, be important in art)