context: be important part of communication process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dimension
Weight: 0.66
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, factor
Weight: 0.63
, discussion
Weight: 0.62
Siblings prefix
Weight: 0.48
, element
Weight: 0.34
, aspect
Weight: 0.34
, picture frame
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important part of communication process 1.00
be important in communication 0.92
be important in archaeology 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(context, be important part of communication process)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(context, be important part of communication process)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(context, be important part of communication process)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(context, be important in communication)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(context, be important part of communication process)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(context, be important in communication)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(context, be important part of communication process)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(context, be important in communication)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(context, be important part of communication process)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(context, be important in communication)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(context, be important part of communication process)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(context, be important in archaeology)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(context, be important part of communication process)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(context, be important in archaeology)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(context, be important part of communication process)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(context, be important in archaeology)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(context, be important part of communication process)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(context, be important in archaeology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(context, be important part of communication process)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(context, be important part of communication process)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(context, be important part of communication process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(context, be important part of communication process)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(context, be important part of communication process)