contract: be important for consumers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.66
, loan
Weight: 0.63
, record
Weight: 0.61
, warranty
Weight: 0.58
Siblings lease
Weight: 0.67
, deal
Weight: 0.59
, delivery
Weight: 0.59
, future
Weight: 0.58
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for consumers 1.00
be important to customers 0.85
be important between customers 0.83
be with retailers 0.78
be with annoying customers 0.78
be important between companies 0.76
be important in music industry 0.75
be important for business 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(warranty, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(contract, be important for consumers)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(warranty, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(contract, be important for consumers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(contract, be important for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(warranty, be important to customers)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(contract, be important for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(warranty, be important for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(contract, be important for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(warranty, be important for business)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(contract, be important for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(warranty, be important to customers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(warranty, be important to customers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(contract, be important for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(contract, be important for consumers)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(warranty, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(contract, be important for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(contract, be important for consumers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(contract, be important for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(contract, be important for consumers)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(contract, be important for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(contract, be important between customers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(contract, be important for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(contract, be important between customers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(contract, be important for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(contract, be important in music industry)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(contract, be important for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(contract, be important between companies)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(contract, be important for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(contract, be important between companies)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(contract, be important for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(contract, be important between customers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(contract, be important for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(contract, be important between customers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(contract, be important for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(contract, be important in music industry)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(contract, be important for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(contract, be important between companies)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(contract, be important for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(contract, be important between companies)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(contract, be important for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(contract, be important in music industry)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(contract, be important for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(contract, be important in music industry)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(contract, be important for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(contract, be important for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(contract, be important for consumers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(contract, be important for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(contract, be important for consumers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(contract, be important for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(warranty, be important to customers)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(contract, be important for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(warranty, be important for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(contract, be important for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(warranty, be important to customers)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(contract, be important for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(warranty, be important for business)