control: stop working

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pressure
Weight: 0.61
, equipment
Weight: 0.58
, technology
Weight: 0.58
, part
Weight: 0.57
Siblings remote control
Weight: 0.80
, balance
Weight: 0.62
, thermostat
Weight: 0.60
, gas pedal
Weight: 0.57
, gain
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
stop working 1.00
do work for base running in rtts 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(control, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(thermostat, stop working)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(control, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(remote control, stop working)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(control, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(remote control, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(remote control, stop working)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(control, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(thermostat, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(thermostat, stop working)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(control, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(control, stop working)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(control, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(control, do work for base running in rtts)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(control, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(control, do work for base running in rtts)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(control, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(control, do work for base running in rtts)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(control, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(control, do work for base running in rtts)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(control, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(control, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(control, stop working)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(control, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(control, stop working)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(control, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(remote control, stop working)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(control, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(thermostat, stop working)