control: was important to athens

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pressure
Weight: 0.61
, equipment
Weight: 0.58
, technology
Weight: 0.58
, part
Weight: 0.57
Siblings remote control
Weight: 0.80
, balance
Weight: 0.62
, thermostat
Weight: 0.60
, gas pedal
Weight: 0.57
, gain
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to athens 1.00
was important to romans 0.80
was important to americans 0.77
was important to songhai 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(control, was important to athens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(control, was important to athens)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(control, was important to athens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(control, was important to romans)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(control, was important to athens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(control, was important to romans)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(control, was important to athens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(control, was important to romans)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(control, was important to athens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(control, was important to americans)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(control, was important to athens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(control, was important to americans)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(control, was important to athens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(control, was important to songhai)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(control, was important to athens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(control, was important to songhai)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(control, was important to athens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(control, was important to romans)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(control, was important to athens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(control, was important to songhai)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(control, was important to athens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(control, was important to americans)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(control, was important to athens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(control, was important to songhai)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(control, was important to athens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(control, was important to americans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(control, was important to athens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(control, was important to athens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(control, was important to athens)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(control, was important to athens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(control, was important to athens)