converse: has physical part holes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.54
, shoe
Weight: 0.52
, company
Weight: 0.50
, sneaker
Weight: 0.47
, client
Weight: 0.45
Siblings hyundai
Weight: 0.30
, guinness
Weight: 0.30
, starbucks
Weight: 0.30
, express
Weight: 0.29
, discover
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part holes 1.00
have two holes 0.89
have holes on side 0.89
have two holes on side 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(converse, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(converse, has physical part holes)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(converse, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(converse, have two holes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(converse, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(converse, have two holes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(converse, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(converse, have two holes on side)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(converse, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(converse, have two holes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(converse, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(converse, have holes on side)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(converse, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(converse, have holes on side)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(converse, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(converse, have two holes on side)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(converse, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(converse, have two holes on side)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(converse, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(converse, have holes on side)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(converse, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(converse, have two holes)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(converse, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(converse, have holes on side)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(converse, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(converse, have two holes on side)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(converse, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(converse, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(converse, has physical part holes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(converse, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(converse, has physical part holes)