converse: have two holes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.54
, shoe
Weight: 0.52
, company
Weight: 0.50
, sneaker
Weight: 0.47
, client
Weight: 0.45
Siblings hyundai
Weight: 0.30
, guinness
Weight: 0.30
, starbucks
Weight: 0.30
, express
Weight: 0.29
, discover
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
have two holes 1.00
have two holes on side 0.95
have holes on side 0.92
has physical part holes 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(converse, have two holes)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(converse, have two holes)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(converse, have two holes)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(converse, has physical part holes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(converse, have two holes)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(converse, have two holes on side)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(converse, have two holes)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(converse, have holes on side)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(converse, have two holes)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(converse, has physical part holes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(converse, have two holes)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(converse, has physical part holes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(converse, have two holes)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(converse, have two holes on side)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(converse, have two holes)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(converse, has physical part holes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(converse, have two holes)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(converse, have holes on side)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(converse, have two holes)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(converse, have two holes on side)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(converse, have two holes)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(converse, have holes on side)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(converse, have two holes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(converse, have two holes on side)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(converse, have two holes)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(converse, have holes on side)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(converse, have two holes)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(converse, have two holes)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(converse, have two holes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(converse, have two holes)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(converse, have two holes)