convict: were brought to tasmania

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.54
, prisoner
Weight: 0.48
, term
Weight: 0.48
, favorite
Weight: 0.45
, record
Weight: 0.41
Siblings murderer
Weight: 0.33
, defendant
Weight: 0.33
, criminal
Weight: 0.32
, homeless person
Weight: 0.32
, juror
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
were brought to tasmania 1.00
is brought 0.88
is brought back 0.84
were sent to australia 0.77
were sent australia 0.77
were transported australia 0.76
were sent to western australia 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(convict, were brought to tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(convict, were brought to tasmania)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(convict, were brought to tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(convict, is brought)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(convict, were brought to tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(convict, is brought back)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(convict, were brought to tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(convict, is brought)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(convict, were brought to tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(convict, is brought back)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(convict, were brought to tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(convict, is brought)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(convict, were brought to tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(convict, is brought back)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(convict, were brought to tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(convict, were sent australia)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(convict, were brought to tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(convict, were sent australia)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(convict, were brought to tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(convict, were sent australia)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(convict, were brought to tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(convict, were sent to australia)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(convict, were brought to tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(convict, were sent australia)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(convict, were brought to tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(convict, were sent to western australia)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(convict, were brought to tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(convict, were transported australia)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(convict, were brought to tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(convict, were sent to australia)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(convict, were brought to tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(convict, were transported australia)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(convict, were brought to tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(convict, were sent to australia)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(convict, were brought to tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(convict, were transported australia)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(convict, were brought to tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(convict, were sent to australia)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(convict, were brought to tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(convict, were sent to western australia)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(convict, were brought to tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(convict, were transported australia)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(convict, were brought to tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(convict, were sent to western australia)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(convict, were brought to tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(convict, were sent to western australia)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(convict, were brought to tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(convict, is brought back)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(convict, were brought to tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(convict, is brought)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(convict, were brought to tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(convict, were brought to tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(convict, were brought to tasmania)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(convict, were brought to tasmania) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(convict, were brought to tasmania)