convict: were transported australia

Property	Similarity
were transported australia	1.00
were sent to australia	0.88
were sent australia	0.88
were transported to sydney	0.87
were sent to western australia	0.86
were brought to tasmania	0.76
were treated at port arthur	0.75

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(convict, were transported australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Salient(convict, were sent australia)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(convict, were transported australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(convict, were sent australia)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(convict, were transported australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(convict, were sent australia)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(convict, were transported australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(convict, were transported to sydney)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(convict, were transported australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(convict, were sent to australia)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(convict, were transported australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(convict, were sent australia)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(convict, were transported australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(convict, were sent to australia)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(convict, were transported australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(convict, were transported to sydney)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(convict, were transported australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(convict, were sent to western australia)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(convict, were transported australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Salient(convict, were transported to sydney)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(convict, were transported australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(convict, were sent to australia)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(convict, were transported australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(convict, were sent to australia)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(convict, were transported australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Salient(convict, were brought to tasmania)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(convict, were transported australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Salient(convict, were treated at port arthur)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(convict, were transported australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(convict, were transported to sydney)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(convict, were transported australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(convict, were brought to tasmania)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(convict, were transported australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(convict, were brought to tasmania)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(convict, were transported australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(convict, were brought to tasmania)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(convict, were transported australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(convict, were sent to western australia)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(convict, were transported australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(convict, were treated at port arthur)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(convict, were transported australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(convict, were sent to western australia)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(convict, were transported australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(convict, were treated at port arthur)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(convict, were transported australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(convict, were treated at port arthur)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(convict, were transported australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(convict, were sent to western australia)

Parents	person Weight: 0.54 , prisoner Weight: 0.48 , term Weight: 0.48 , favorite Weight: 0.45 , record Weight: 0.41
Siblings	murderer Weight: 0.33 , defendant Weight: 0.33 , criminal Weight: 0.32 , homeless person Weight: 0.32 , juror Weight: 0.32

convict: were transported australia

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible