cooked food: is more nutritious

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more nutritious 1.00
is nutritious 0.99
be better than food 0.79
keep longer than fresh food 0.77
be better than raw food 0.76
have more calories 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cooked food, is more nutritious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(cooked food, is more nutritious)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cooked food, is more nutritious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(cooked food, is nutritious)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(cooked food, is more nutritious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(cooked food, is nutritious)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(cooked food, is more nutritious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cooked food, is nutritious)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cooked food, is more nutritious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cooked food, be better than food)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(cooked food, is more nutritious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(cooked food, be better than food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(cooked food, is more nutritious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(cooked food, be better than food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(cooked food, is more nutritious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(cooked food, keep longer than fresh food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cooked food, is more nutritious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(cooked food, keep longer than fresh food)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cooked food, is more nutritious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cooked food, be better than raw food)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cooked food, is more nutritious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cooked food, have more calories)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(cooked food, is more nutritious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(cooked food, be better than raw food)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(cooked food, is more nutritious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(cooked food, have more calories)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cooked food, is more nutritious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cooked food, is nutritious)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(cooked food, is more nutritious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(cooked food, keep longer than fresh food)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(cooked food, is more nutritious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(cooked food, be better than raw food)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(cooked food, is more nutritious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(cooked food, have more calories)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cooked food, is more nutritious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cooked food, keep longer than fresh food)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cooked food, is more nutritious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cooked food, have more calories)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cooked food, is more nutritious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cooked food, be better than raw food)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cooked food, is more nutritious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(cooked food, be better than food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(cooked food, is more nutritious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cooked food, is more nutritious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cooked food, is more nutritious)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(cooked food, is more nutritious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cooked food, is more nutritious)