copper: is conductive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heavy metal
Weight: 0.71
, commodity
Weight: 0.66
, metal
Weight: 0.65
, resource
Weight: 0.64
Siblings copper sulfate
Weight: 0.79
, zinc
Weight: 0.38
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.38
, gold
Weight: 0.38
, aluminum
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is conductive 1.00
have conductivity 0.82
have electrical conductivity 0.82
have thermal conductivity 0.81
have high electrical conductivity 0.81
have high conductivity 0.81
have high thermal conductivity 0.81
go to electrode 0.80
is magnetic 0.80
is non magnetic 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(metal, is magnetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(copper, is conductive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(copper, is conductive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(metal, is magnetic)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(copper, is conductive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(metal, is magnetic)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(metal, is magnetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(copper, is conductive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(copper, is conductive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(copper, is conductive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(copper, is conductive)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(copper, is conductive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(copper, is non magnetic)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(copper, is conductive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(copper, is non magnetic)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(copper, is conductive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(copper, is non magnetic)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(copper, is conductive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(copper, is non magnetic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(copper, is conductive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(copper, is conductive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(copper, is conductive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(copper, is conductive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(copper, is conductive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(copper, is conductive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(metal, is magnetic)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(copper, is conductive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(metal, is magnetic)