copper: is non magnetic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heavy metal
Weight: 0.71
, commodity
Weight: 0.66
, metal
Weight: 0.65
, resource
Weight: 0.64
Siblings copper sulfate
Weight: 0.79
, zinc
Weight: 0.38
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.38
, gold
Weight: 0.38
, aluminum
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is non magnetic 1.00
is magnetic 0.95
is conductive 0.79
is paramagnetic 0.78
have one valence electron 0.77
have high electrical conductivity 0.77
have electrical conductivity 0.76
have 1 valence electron 0.76
is diamagnetic 0.76
have high thermal conductivity 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(metal, is magnetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(copper, is non magnetic)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(copper, is non magnetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(metal, is magnetic)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(copper, is non magnetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(metal, is magnetic)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(metal, is magnetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(copper, is non magnetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(copper, is non magnetic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(copper, is non magnetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(copper, is non magnetic)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(copper, is non magnetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(copper, is conductive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(copper, is non magnetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(copper, is conductive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(copper, is non magnetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(copper, is conductive)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(copper, is non magnetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(copper, is conductive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(copper, is non magnetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(copper, is non magnetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(copper, is non magnetic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(copper, is non magnetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(copper, is non magnetic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(copper, is non magnetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(metal, is magnetic)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(copper, is non magnetic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(metal, is magnetic)